– Markets have focussed on the debt problems of the US and Europe over the past month with the progress of the recovery taking a backseat. ….
Keith Wade, Chief Economist and Azad Zangana, European Economist of Schroders
Sign up for our weekly Newsletter and receive the latest ETF and ETC news.
Click here to register for your free copy
– One explanation would be the widely held view that a last minute deal will be agreed by the Republicans and Democrats, or as some argue, the US Treasury will find a way of meeting coupon payments even in the event of a failure to lift the ceiling.
– This may prove optimistic, what can be said with some certainty though is that an agreement to lift the debt ceiling will not be the end of the story. S&P have made it clear that the US could still be downgraded unless a long term solution to the deficit is found. Given the polarisation that exists between the political parties such a solution between a re-elected President Obama and a
divided Congress seems unlikely. Investors can look forward to more political wrangling and a likely downgrade to US government debt.
– Special temporary factors have had a major impact on the latest set of data.
The biggest has been the extra bank holiday in April to celebrate the royal wedding. Excluding the impact of the special factors, growth would have accelerated rather than slowed.
– We believe that underlying growth in the economy remains robust and that we should see a pick up in the second half of the year. Despite pressure, the government is unlikely to deviate from its current fiscal strategy, while the Bank of England should resist temptations to restart quantitative easing.
Debt woes bring political risk to the fore
The progress of the economic recovery has taken a backseat over the past month as markets have focussed on the fiscal struggles in the US and Eurozone.
Not surprisingly this backdrop has been good for gold which has now broken through the $1600/ oz level. Fearful of default, investors are seeking alternative risk free assets to AAA rated government debt and the “barbarous relic” has been a beneficiary. Gold and other commodities have also benefitted from weakness in the US dollar. Yet, despite the deadlock over the debt ceiling, US Treasury bonds have remained firm with 10 year yields hugging 3% (see chart
1). Given that the past month has also seen the end of quantitative easing, the Treasury market has been remarkably resilient in the face of political risk.
US – heading for a voluntary default-
One explanation for the lack of reaction in US Treasuries would be that investors simply do not believe that politicians will fail to lift the debt ceiling. Whilst this may show touching faith in the ability of a divided Congress to do the right thing, this is looking like more of a risk as the deadline approaches and the gulf between Republicans and Democrats remains.
One hope is that in the event of failing to lift the ceiling, coupon payments will be prioritised and there have been discussions between the Whitehouse and Treasury on how this might be achieved. Gold sales from reserves have been mentioned as a source of funding, for example. How politicians then justify prioritising investors whilst cutting public services remains to be seen. The consensus is that coupons will be paid, even though this would mean potentially missing a large social security payment on August 3rd.
The ratings agencies, however, have been clear: S&P, Moody’s and Fitch say they would downgrade the US in the event of failing to lift the debt ceiling and a coupon or principal payment is then missed. S&P have also said they would put the US in selective default in these circumstances. Should this occur and be followed by other agencies there could be an almighty scramble for the remaining AAA rated securities with some investors having little option but to sell Treasury bonds.
At present the offer from the Republicans is to lift the ceiling in two steps with the result that another decision would be needed in six months time. Not surprisingly, the Obama administration are keen to avoid this as it would mean that the issue would return during the Presidential election year.
Looking further ahead though, whatever the outcome in the near term, a solution to the deficit needs to be found. Figures from the OECD show the US is expected to run a deficit of 10% GDP in 2011 with total public debt rising above 100% GDP. The lack of political consensus means that the deficit is only expected to fall to 9% of GDP in 2012, with outstanding debt rising to 107% GDP. S&P have indicated that even if the debt ceiling is lifted and no coupons or principal payments are missed they could still downgrade the US if long term measures are not put in place to bring down the deficit.
This suggests that the current debate on the debt ceiling will be just a taste of things to come. It is not that Republicans and Democrats cannot come together, but that the likelihood of agreement is low when views are so polarised. For example, although difficult to quantify, academic estimates suggest that the ideological gap between the two parties on the issue of the role of government in the economy is currently wider than at any time since the civil war
Will we see a crisis as a result with bond yields spiking higher- There seems to be a high probability of US government debt being downgraded. This might trigger a funding problem and some switching by investors, but the US still has the advantage of being the reserve currency of the world. Unless central banks in Asia and the Middle East stop hoovering up dollars then yields could remain range bound.
On Europe, the latest package is seen as a step forward in that it reduces the levels of Greek debt outstanding through (a) imposing a haircut on bond holders who now face the choice of “voluntarily” rolling over their holdings, and (b) giving a greater role to the European Financial Stability Fund (EFSF), creating a framework for dealing with future crisis.
Our European economist Azad Zangana has given our reaction to the package which makes us marginally more optimistic as it should kick Greece into touch for a period. In our view though it leaves two unanswered questions.
The one factor which would help both the US and Europe is, of course, growth.
Unfortunately at this point the post financial crisis economy in the US and Europe seems unlikely to be able to deliver the above trend increases in activity needed to significantly bring down unemployment and the budget deficit.
Bad luck or a more serious problem-
Yet another dissapointing GDP print in the UK, once again sparking a debate about the state of the UK economy, and whether a ‘plan B’ is needed.
The Office for National Statistics estimates real GDP growth to have slowed from 0.5% in the first quarter of the year, to just 0.2% in the second quarter of the year (see chart A). This means that the economy has grown by just 1.4% over the first half of the year on an annualised basis – close to half of the previously estimated trend rate of growth. At this rate, it could take another two and a half years before output returns to its pre-recession peak back in Q1 2008.
In commenting on the data, Chancellor George Osborne said: “The positive news is that the British economy is continuing to grow and is creating jobs. And it is positive news too that at a time of real international instability we are a safe haven in the storm.”
Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls took a predictably different view, accusing the Chancellor of being “breathtakingly complacent”, blaming the government’s tax and spending policy. The opposition Labour party is calling for a new strategy on growth, in particular, a reversal of the VAT hike earlier this year, and slower and smaller cuts to public sector expenditure.
Though we are unbiased in analysing the political situation in the UK, we would point out that there was little difference between the previous Labour Party Chancellor’s budget plans, and the current plans being implemented by the coalition government. Regular readers will remember that we had predicted VAT to rise before the 2010 general election, regardless of which party would be victorious.
More special factors
This is the second GDP release in the past year that has dissapointed. The half a percentage point contraction in the final quarter of last year was blamed on heavy snow disrupting business. This time, there were three special factors mentioned in the ONS’ release that contributed towards the slowdown in activity:
The closure of Japanese manufacturing plants meant that UK car manufacturers that are reliant on these plants had to slow production significantly. For example, the Honda plant in Swindon, Wilshire said that it would halve weekly production from April, while Toyota announced it would close its Burnaston factory in Derbyshire for two days each week in May.
The earthquake and tsunami hit Japan on the 11th of March, but the most of the economic impact on UK manufacturers came a month later. The ONS estimates motor viehicle and trailer production to have fallen by 7.1% in April, and has since only picked up by 4% in May (see chart 3).
Though the car production industry is a relatively small contributor to economic growth (0.3% of total gross value added), we estimate that assuming car production was unchanged in June, then data for April and May suggests the industry could have detracted a tenth of a percentage point from GDP growth in the second quarter.
The good news is that both Honda and Toyota expect to make up the short fall in production this year, which means that we should expect better than previously forecast growth for the second half of the year.
The second special factor was the unseasonally warm weather in the second quarter. According to the Met Office (the UK’s national weather service), April 2011 was the wamest April since records began in 1910, averaging between 3 to 5 °C warmer than normal. Consequently, demand for heating, and therefore also gas and electricity supply was much lower than usual.
The final special factor was the extra bank holiday to celebrate the royal wedding of the now Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. It is common practice to adjust for working days in national accounts data, which is why the timing of floating holidays like Easter do not have a major impact on quarterly data (note that the same treatment is not applied to inflation data, hence recent volatility). However, as the extra bank holiday is a special one-off, the ONS has not adjusted for the loss of a working day. This is consistent with what has happened in the past.
The worst possible case scenario would be if the entire economy had stopped working on that day, which means a loss of 1 of the 62 working days in Q2, knocking off 1.6 percentage points from Q2 GDP growth. Clearly, many companies were open for business on the bank holiday, and so the impact would have been smaller.
The last example of this type of holiday was Her Majesty the Queen’s Golden Jubilee celebration in June 2002. In fact, when comparing the impact of the latest holiday to that in 2002, we can see that with the exception of the supply of electricity, gas and water (see warm weather explanation above), all other major sub-indices of GDP fell by less than they did in June 2002. For example,
manufacturing sector output fell by 5.4% in June 2002, but by only 1.6% in April 2011.
So what is the true state of the UK economy once these special factors have been netted out- The ONS helpfully estimates GDP growth to have actually accelerated from 0.5% in the first quarter to 0.7% in the second quarter had these short term shocks not taken place. Though we only have a consensus estimate of what the actual outcome was expected to be and not what it would have been excluding the special factors, we believe that many city economists would have been surprised by the underlying strength of the economy that the ONS is suggesting.
One way to check the state of the economy is to compare survey evidence to official data. For the service sector, most of the monthly indicators available are suggesting slightly below trend growth across the sector, with retail sector survey indicators suggesting the weakest level of activity (see chart 5). However, the range of indicators suggest between -0.2% and +0.2% growth for the three months to June 2011. This is lower than 0.5% Q2 growth estimated by the ONS, though these surveys have consistently underestimated service sector growth recently.
For the manufacturing sector, with the exception of the Markit PMI output index which has recently fallen below its long-run average, the remaining are reporting activity of between 1 and 1.5 standard deviations above their long-run trend. This means the surveys are suggesting growth for the manufacturing sector of between 0% and 1.4% in the three months to June. Compared to the 0.3% estimated by the ONS, this suggests that there could be some upside risk to the official estimate.
Looking ahead & policy implications
With regards to our UK growth forecast, the 0.2% result for second quarter growth was below our 0.4% estimate. However, our analysis suggests that the slowdown in Q2 should be temporary, and that the underlying economy is still making good progress in spite of these shocks. We have therefore not changed our forecast of 2.4% annualised for the second half of the year (0.7% for Q3, 0.5% in Q4). This means that our 2011 forecast as a whole has been reduced from 1.5% to 1.3%, but that our 2012 forecast remains unchanged at 1.9%.
In addition to the special factors discussed above, little attention has been given to the impact of the first phase of ticket sales for the London 2012 Olympics.
In terms of policy response, we believe the government is unlikely to react by slowing the pace of fiscal consolidation. The next forecast update from the Office for Budgetary Responsibility (OBR) is due in the autumn, while the next budget is still some way away. In fact, though we doubt that the reaction would necessarily be to slow down fiscal consolidation. If the OBR is doing its job and the government serious about meeting its fiscal targets, then a downgrading of
growth could even warrant more fiscal tightening, not less, despite the risks this would raise of a debt-deflation spiral.
Weaker growth may however prompt the Bank of England to be more vocal on its consideration of more quantitative easing. Assuming the Bank agrees with our assessment of the current situation, then it should look through the recent weakness, and opt not to restart its bond purchasing programme. That may disappoint certain members of the current government, but in our view, is the more prudent measure at this juncture.
A final note on the special celebrations, we of course congratulate the royal couple, and look forward to celebrating Her Majesty’s Diamond Jubilee in 2012, but an easy way to boost growth would be to temporarily suspend one or more of the eight official annual bank holidays. Though we doubt there will be much support for this idea!
The views and opinions contained herein are those of Schroder Investments Management’s Economics team, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. For professional investors and advisers only. This document is not suitable for retail clients. This document is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroder Investment Management Ltd (Schroders) does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact or opinion. This does not exclude or restrict any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended from time to time) or any other regulatory system. Schroders has expressed its own views and opinions in this document and these may change. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in the document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Issued by Schroder Investment Management Limited, 31 Gresham Street, London EC2V 7QA, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. For your security, communications may be taped or monitored.
Source: ETFWorld – Schroders